<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems in Analog CTI boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/</link>
	<description>IVR, Interactive Voice Response System, CTI Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uttam Pegu</title>
		<link>http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Uttam Pegu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivrsworld.com/?p=458#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Hi Jayakrishnan,
   I got my DTMF Caller ID solved. Thank you for the tip! I also realised that in digital boards/ digital interface, we can &quot;program&quot; the length of the Caller Id digits, but in Analog Boards, lenght of Caller ID can be any digit according to whim and fancy of the PBX or switch. And specially here in India, with multiple switches, PBXes (from variety of manufacturer),  installed everywhere, it is surely a problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jayakrishnan,<br />
   I got my DTMF Caller ID solved. Thank you for the tip! I also realised that in digital boards/ digital interface, we can &#8220;program&#8221; the length of the Caller Id digits, but in Analog Boards, lenght of Caller ID can be any digit according to whim and fancy of the PBX or switch. And specially here in India, with multiple switches, PBXes (from variety of manufacturer),  installed everywhere, it is surely a problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayakrishnan K</title>
		<link>http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayakrishnan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivrsworld.com/?p=458#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Btw... if you got the DTMF Caller ID solved, please don&#039;t forget the case where a call that&#039;s not picked up comes-in followed by an second  call. If not correctly implemented you will end up with multiple caller-id information in your second call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw&#8230; if you got the DTMF Caller ID solved, please don&#8217;t forget the case where a call that&#8217;s not picked up comes-in followed by an second  call. If not correctly implemented you will end up with multiple caller-id information in your second call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uttam Pegu</title>
		<link>http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Uttam Pegu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivrsworld.com/?p=458#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Yes, call transfer is another pain! All PBX manufacturer has different FLASH time and they just don&#039;t seem to like to share their values!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, call transfer is another pain! All PBX manufacturer has different FLASH time and they just don&#8217;t seem to like to share their values!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayakrishnan K</title>
		<link>http://www.ivrsworld.com/cti-cards/problems-in-analog-cti-boards/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayakrishnan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivrsworld.com/?p=458#comment-258</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention Call Transfer. That&#039;s a pain to implement and get correct on analog boards and that&#039;s the one feature users mostly want  :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention Call Transfer. That&#8217;s a pain to implement and get correct on analog boards and that&#8217;s the one feature users mostly want  <img src='http://www.ivrsworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

